Valutatio efficacitatis in calcio

Goals, assists, clean sheets. These numbers come to mind first when trying to evaluate a football player. Scored 30 goals in the season — he is good. Made 15 assistive passes — a valuable player. But football has long ceased to be such simple mathematics. In 2026, the evaluation of efficiency is a complex cocktail of traditional statistics, big data analysis, neural networks, and even psychological tests. How to understand who is truly useful for the team and who is just "padding numbers"?

Goals and assists: classic, which has not become outdated

The main indicators of efficiency for forwards and attacking midfielders are goals and assistive passes. It is believed that a top striker should score at least 0.5 goals per game. In the 2025 APL, Erling Haaland had a score of 1.2 goals per match — a phenomenon. Assists: for wingers, the norm is 0.3-0.4 assists per game. However, goals and passes do not always reflect the real contribution. A player may score 10 goals, but all of them in already won matches, not affecting the result. Therefore, the statistics are supplemented with "goals in key moments" (in the first halves, at 0:0, in matches against top teams).

Expected goals (xG): statistics of the quality of moments

The most popular advanced indicator today is xG (expected goals). It measures the quality of the shot: from what position, with what foot, at what angle, after what pass, considering the defenders. xG from 0.1 to 0.3 is considered low, 0.3-0.6 is average, above 0.6 is high. A player who scores more than his xG (for example, 20 goals with xG 15) exceeds the norm and is considered "cool-headed". The one who scores less (10 with xG 15) is unrealized. In 2026, xG is used everywhere, even in amateur leagues with the help of mobile applications.

Expected assists (xA) and key passes

Similarly to xG, there is xA (expected assists). It measures how qualitatively a player creates moments for partners. A pass to an empty goal has a high xA. But there are also "key passes" — a pass that ends with a shot. A player who makes 2-3 key passes per match is valued even without assistive goals. In 2026, the "progressive pass" is in vogue — a pass that moves the ball towards the opponent's goal. Such passes are often more important than goals because they break down the defense.

Goalkeeping efficiency: not only clean sheets

The main indicator for goalkeepers is "clean sheets" (clean sheets). But this is not enough. xG against (xG against) shows how many goals the goalkeeper should have missed by quality of moments. If the goalkeeper misses less than xG, he is saving. Also, the percentage of saves (70% — average, 75% — good, 80% — elite) is considered. In 2026, "expected saves" were introduced — they take into account not only the number of shots but also their complexity. Goalkeepers who save "dead" balls get a high rating.

Defenders: tackles, interceptions, clearances

How to evaluate a defender if he does not score? Consider the number of tackles (tackles), interceptions (interceptions), clearances. But more important is the percentage of won duels, especially in the air. In 2026, the "PAdj" (composite rating of defenders) is popular, which takes into account all defensive actions. Also, how the defender participates in the start of attacks (percentage of accurate passes, especially long ones) is assessed. A center-back who makes 5 accurate long passes per match is very valuable.

Midfielders: percentage of passes and pressing

For midfielders, accuracy of passes (85%+ for central) and the number of passes per game (60-80 for playmaker) are important. But also — PPDA (passes allowed per defensive action) — how many passes the opponent's team allows before interception. The indicator of pressing efficiency. Players who win the ball on the opponent's half increase the team's PPDA. In 2026, the "pressure index" was introduced — how many times a player enters a tackle per match (12-15 — good).

Team efficiency: ball possession, shots, corners

Not only players but also the team as a whole are evaluated. Main metrics: ball possession (50-60% — normal), shots on goal (15-20 per match — good), corners (5-6), number of yellow cards (less — better). In 2026, the "rating of attacking efficiency" is popular — the ratio of goals scored to xG. A team that scores as many goals as it creates moments is balanced.

Individual ratings: WhoScored, SofaScore, Opta

These platforms give an average rating from 1 to 10 per match. The algorithm takes into account all actions: goals, passes, tackles, dribbles, even fouls. A rating of 7.5 is a good game, 8.5 is excellent, 9+ is a masterpiece. In 2026, these ratings are used by scouts and fantasy managers. However, they are subjective — for example, they overestimate dribbles (even useless).

Psychological aspects: the influence of pressure and motivation

Efficiency depends not only on skills but also on psychology. In 2026, clubs use the "conversion coefficient" — the ratio of goals to shots in stressful situations (penalties, added time). Players with a high conversion coefficient are called "cool-headed". Also, the "return index" is considered — how quickly a player recovers from a mistake. This is not a statistic in numbers, but analysts record it.

Future of evaluation: neural networks and videography

Since 2025, neural networks have been analyzing match videos, identifying hidden patterns. For example, off-ball runs that create space for others. A player who does not touch the ball but creates a zone now gets a high "opening rating". In 2026, such data already affect transfers. The next step is the evaluation of "progressive pressure" and "prediction". However, traditional numbers remain the foundation.

The evaluation of efficiency in football has become multi-dimensional. One goal can be worth dozens of hidden actions. In 2026, to understand who is the best, you need to look not only at numbers but also at context. And still, the most important things — how the game, passion, and result — cannot be measured by any metric.

Permanent link to this publication: