Feminine friendship and overcoming stereotypes: from the myth of competition to the strength of alliance

Introduction: between clichés and reality

Feminine friendship has been surrounded by stereotypes for centuries, depicting it as superficial, based on gossip and jealousy, or as an unstable alliance inevitably destroyed by competition for male attention. These narratives, rooted in patriarchal structures, ignore the complex social, psychological, and neurobiological reality of friendships between women. Modern science — from social psychology and anthropology to neurophysiology — provides data for the deconstruction of these myths, revealing feminine friendship as a powerful adaptive mechanism, a source of resilience, and a driver of personal growth.

Deconstruction of key stereotypes

“Women are competitors, not allies”: This stereotype dates back to the theory of sexual selection, where women are said to compete for resources provided by men. However, anthropological research (such as the works of Sarah Blaffer Hrdy) shows that in evolutionary history, the survival of offspring and women themselves often depended on cooperation within female groups — joint child care, food gathering, protection. Modern sociological data indicate that although competition exists, it is not the dominant motive; women often compete not with each other, but with systemic barriers.

“Feminine friendship is emotional but not active”: The opposition between “emotional” feminine friendship and “business-like” masculine friendship is false. Research on social support networks demonstrates that women tend to create dense, multifunctional networks where emotional support is inextricably linked to practical assistance (from doctor recommendations to career help). The so-called “glass ceiling” is often overcome precisely through informal feminine alliances and mentorship.

“Friends always complain and are ‘toxic’”: The image of friendship as endless joint “chewing over” problems (co-rumination) indeed has a basis: women are more likely to use conversation as an instrument of emotional regulation. However, meta-analyses show that deep, trusting conversations, including negative experiences, with empathetic responses lead not to exacerbation of problems, but to cognitive processing of stress, a decrease in cortisol levels, and an increase in subjective well-being. The problem is not discussing difficulties, but a lack of balance and support.

Neurobiology and physiology of feminine friendship

Science provides biological arguments against the myth of “natural” competition.

Oxytocin and the “tendency to care and befriend” (tend-and-befriend): In response to stress, unlike the male “fight-or-flight” response, the female system is more often activated, associated with the production of oxytocin. This hormone stimulates not only maternal behavior but also a desire for social connections, strengthening trust, and cooperation. Evolutionarily, this increased the chances of survival for women and their offspring in the group.

Neurobiology of empathy: Studies using fMRI show that the female brain, on average, demonstrates higher activity in areas related to the processing of emotions and empathy when observing the suffering of others. This creates a neurobiological basis for deep emotional resonance, lying at the heart of close friendship.

Social functions and benefits of feminine friendship

Overcoming stereotypes allows us to see the real social power of these connections:

Buff against stress and depression: Quality friendship is one of the strongest predictors of women's mental health. Support from friends reduces the risk of depression, especially during crisis periods (divorce, job loss, illness).

“Critical mass” and social change: Historically, feminine friendship has been the foundation for the formation of political and social movements (suffragism, civil rights movement, environmental initiatives). From Enlightenment salons to modern book clubs and professional communities — informal feminine networks serve as incubators of ideas and platforms for collective action.

An alternative narrative space: In a friendship circle, women often feel freer to discuss topics tabooed in patriarchal society (sexuality, career ambitions, dissatisfaction in marriage), creating counter-narratives and strengthening their subjectivity.

Overcoming stereotypes: examples and strategies

Media representations: The gradual shift from the image of “competitors” (as in the early seasons of “Friends”, “Sex and the City”) to more complex portraits of solidary, long-term friendship, experiencing crises but based on mutual respect (“Girls”, “The Glitz”, the Russian series “Contact”).

Public figures: The demonstration of public feminine friendship-solitude, as in the case of actresses Michelle Obama and Oprah Winfrey, or scientists supporting each other in male academic environments, works to dismantle stereotypes.

Practices of “radical candor” and active listening in feminine circles, aimed at replacing hidden competition with open support and joint search for solutions.

Interesting facts and examples

Evolutionary example: Orca social structures are matriarchal, and females live for decades after menopause, actively helping daughters raise offspring and sharing knowledge about feeding locations. This is a direct analogy to the evolutionary role of feminine cooperation.

Historical club: “The Society of Blue Stockings” in 18th-century England — a circle of educated women and men where literature and science were discussed. It became the prototype of intellectual communities where feminine friendship and scholarship were encouraged.

Harvard “Students” study: One of the longest longitudinal studies of women's health showed that having close friends and social connections is even more significant for women than for men in terms of longevity and health.

The “bro” phenomenon in pop culture: The emergence of the term “girlbro” or the demonstration of feminine friendship in sports (such as support between tennis players Serena Williams and Naomi Osaka) indicates the complexity of the image, including elements previously considered exclusively masculine.

Conclusion

Feminine friendship, freed from the burden of stereotypes, appears not as a pleasant addition to “real” life, but as its fundamental support and source of strength. This is a complex, multi-level phenomenon that performs critically important functions: from neurobiological stress regulation to social transformation of reality.

Overcoming myths of competition and superficiality requires both individual reflection (refusal of internalized misogyny) and cultural changes — creating more positive, complex images of feminine solidarity in media, literature, and science. True feminine friendship is not the negation of complexities (jealousy, conflicts, disagreements exist), but the ability to create a space where these complexities can be worked through without destroying the connection. In an era of loneliness and mental crises, such trusting, supportive alliances become one of the key resources for health, well-being, and personal realization of women. Friendship between women is not a drama, but a driver of development, and its study and affirmation are an important step towards a healthier and more just society.
© elibrary.org.uk

Permanent link to this publication: