Representate: April 1917. Finnish railway station, armoured car, the famous speech "There is such a party!". But Vladimir Ilich does not pronounce it aloud — he writes a post in the Telegram channel. Thousands of workers and soldiers like it, repost "April Theses" in the public "Windows of ROSTA", and Mensheviks try to ban him for misinformation. It sounds like the ravings of a madman, but let's imagine: what would have happened if Lenin had modern internet in 1917? Mobile phone, social networks, viral videos, and recommendation algorithms — how would they change the course of the revolution, the Civil War, and possibly the whole XX century?

"April Theses" as a viral meme

The real "April Theses" were met by party members with a bayonet: Kamenev and Rykov called them "nonsense". In internet reality, everything would have been different. Lenin launches a video on YouTube: "THE WORLD — TO THE PEOPLES! THE LAND — TO THE PEASANTS! FACTORIES — TO THE WORKERS!". Short, bold, with a rhythmic music. A checklist "10 steps to seize power" in the style of info-cыганов would go viral on TikTok. A Telegram bot would distribute cards with quotes. Moderate socialists would be in an informational hole: they did not understand algorithms, could not shoot shorts, did not know what targeting was. In three months, the Bolsheviks would have transformed from a marginal party to the main trend — not because of underground printing houses, but because of coverage and reposts.

Kerensky loses in comments

Alexander Kerensky, the head of the Provisional Government, was a brilliant orator. But oratory in the XX century is not the same as the skill of running a post on Instagram. Kerensky would most likely have led a cabinet account with banal phrases: "The government is taking measures". Lenin would have created a network of Facebook groups ("Mother — soldier", "Working core", "Factory bell") with personalized agitation. Trolling Kerensky would have become a national sport: a meme with the caption "Minister-Chairman in the bread line" would have spread faster than real reports from the front. In conditions of war and hunger, trust in the government would have fallen even faster — because every second comment under the government's post would have been "Kerensky — traitor!" from bots (by the way, were there bots then? Probably, anarchists with IP change).

Secret Telegram channel of the Central Committee and a leak of ciphers

Conspiracies are the basis of Lenin's tactics. With the internet, everything would have become both simpler and more dangerous. The Central Committee of the Bolsheviks would have created a secret Telegram channel with two-factor authentication. There they would discuss plans for an armed uprising, coordinate actions. But the Okhrana also did not sleep — they would have hacked accounts, intercepted messages. In real history, Lenin wrote ciphers with milk between the lines. In an alternative — he would have encrypted correspondence in WhatsApp, but Plekhanov would have leaked screenshots in "Chat of Russophobes". Moreover, Trotsky would have become the king of Twitter battles, gathering hundreds of thousands of subscribers with his witty thread-nits. Kamenev and Zinoviev, on the other hand, would have become famous as "leakers of logs" after the publication of secret voice messages.

Crowdfunding the revolution: donations from the proletariat

In real history, the Bolsheviks faced constant financial difficulties. Expropriations, printing houses, weapons — all cost money. With the internet, Lenin would have launched a crowdfunding campaign on the crowdfunding platform "Bombyla". Donations for "liberation of the workers from the chains of capitalism" were supported by thousands of small investors: artisans donated a ruble, soldiers a half-penny. British laborists and German social democrats would have transferred cryptocurrency to the party's wallets, bypassing state banks. By October, the Bolsheviks' treasury would have been bursting with bitcoins (well, conditional ones). Smolny would not have had to take it by force — it would have been simply bought with the funds raised through the public "Let's raise money for Lenin's armoured car".

"Digital schism": how the internet would have accelerated the Civil War

The flip side is total information war. The Civil War would have started not in 1918, but already in November 1917, immediately after the October coup, because the internet does not tolerate half-tones. Today you like Lenin, tomorrow they come to you for a search for reposts of the white guard. Social media algorithms would have created echo chambers: reds subscribed to red channels, whites to whites, green anarchists went into the darknet. Disinformation would have multiplied at the speed of a fire. Each side would have spread deepfakes: Lenin drinking vodka with Rasputin, Kolchak kissing the kaiser, Makhno selling Ukraine to Petliura. A peaceful alternative (coalition of socialists) would have become impossible — because no one would have agreed in comments, every post would have immediately turned into a fight.

If the internet was available to everyone: the reaction of the tsarism, the Provisional Government, and the Entente

Of course, Lenin was not the only one to get access to the network. The tsarist censorship (and then the censorship of the Provisional Government) tried to block "extremist resources". Roskomnadzor of 1917 would have added "Izvestia" and "Pravda" to the register of prohibited sites. But the Bolsheviks would have learned to use VPN, proxies, anonymizers, and mirrors — the classic of the genre. The Entente (countries of the West) would have launched propaganda bots: "Lenin — German spy, click on the link". But the tweet war between Wilson and Lenin would have remained in history as an epic battle of threads. The result — informational chaos, in which truth would have finally mixed with lies, and events would have been managed not by bayonets, but by hype.

The main lesson: technology does not change goals, but accelerates the process

The result of our thought experiment: the internet would not have turned Lenin into a pacifist and would not have canceled the Civil War. The same tasks — seizure of power, suppression of resistance, redistribution of property — would have been solved faster and with fewer human losses at the stage of agitation, but with even more severe repression at the stage of information control. Lenin would have appreciated digitalization, but would have put it to the service of the party. "Communism is Soviet power plus blockchain," he would have written in his last interview with a youtube blogger. And we would have liked this post, even knowing how it ended.

Permanent link to this publication: