Imagine: you put on light virtual reality glasses — and suddenly you find yourself at "Camp Nou." Next to you is an avatar of a friend from Tokyo, and an avatar of Messi (who is already 40 but immortal in the digital world) is running on the field. You scream, wave a virtual flag, and in a second you are transported to "Maracana" to watch the final. This is not science fiction. The metaverse is already entering sports, and by 2035 virtual stadiums may become the norm. They will not replace live emotions, but complement them, making sports accessible to billions. How will it work? What are the benefits for fans, clubs, and sponsors? Let's look into the near future.
Initially, we watched sports at the stadium. Then — on television. Later — on a laptop and smartphone. The next stage is immersion. Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies have reached such a level that already in 2026 you can buy a ticket to a "virtual match" and feel yourself on the stands. But the real metaverse is not just 360-degree video. It is a shared space where thousands of fans can interact with each other, choose the angle, even influence the atmosphere (for example, lighting virtual fireworks). Unlike television, where you are a passive viewer, in the metaverse you are a participant.
A virtual stadium is a 3D model of a real arena (or a fantasy one). You enter through a portal (a website, an app, a VR headset). Create an avatar (your own face or a fictional character). Buy a "digital ticket" for cryptocurrency or fiat. Choose a section: VIP box, fan "kettle," family section. Inside, everything is like at a real stadium: scoreboard, commentator, beer stands (where you can buy virtual beer, but drink it in real life — delivery by courier). Cameras from the real match are broadcasted into the 3D model. You can watch the game from any angle: sitting behind the goal, from the height of a bird's flight, even from the point of view of a player (if he is wearing a camera). The signal delay in 2026 is already less than 0.5 seconds, which is almost imperceptible.
Virtual stadiums allow you to do what is forbidden at a real stadium. For example, choose the color of your section and influence the "wave." You can communicate with neighbors on the stands through chat or voice (with a translator). You can buy virtual souvenirs (scarves, hats), which are displayed on your avatar. You can make instant bets (without bookmakers, directly inside the match). The main innovation is "emotional synchronization." The algorithm measures your pulse (through a bracelet) and transmits it to the general mood graph of the stadium. When tens of thousands of avatars start screaming, the virtual stands "come to life": lights flash, the floor shakes. The sense of presence is enhanced.
For clubs, this is new sources of income. Digital tickets can be sold without restrictions — the stadium holds not 80,000, but 8 million. The club can rent advertising spaces on virtual billboards. Sponsors are ready to pay for "digital banners" that are visible from anywhere in the world. Moreover, the club sells virtual merchandise: jerseys with engravings in the meta-garage. Fans spend real money on in-game purchases. Some clubs are already launching crowdfunding for the construction of virtual stadiums in 2026, issuing NFT tickets for eternal ownership of "a place." However, there is a risk of a "bubble" — when demand for virtual goods exceeds their real value.
A virtual stadium can unite fans from countries where there is no normal stadium or where football is forbidden. It will give people with disabilities (wheelchair users) the opportunity to "sit" on any stand. It allows you to support anonymously (if you are embarrassed by your emotions). However, there are also drawbacks: trolling, cyberbullying, the creation of "crypto-fanatic" groups that will be hostile as much as real ultras. Moderation will be a headache. Who will be the judge in the metaverse? A virtual police force? An AI moderator that bans for insults? Questions are still unanswered.
For mass adoption, we need cheap and light VR glasses. Currently, headsets cost $300-1000 and cause motion sickness for some. We need ultra-fast networks (6G and above) to transmit 8K streams with 1000 cameras on the stadium. We need powerful servers capable of processing the actions of millions of avatars simultaneously. In 2026, such loads are being tested in China and South Korea. Europe and the US are lagging behind. In addition, there is the problem of cyber security: hackers can disrupt a match by replacing the broadcast or creating tens of thousands of bot-aggressors. Blockchain technologies help, but not completely.
Some leagues are already experimenting. NBA (basketball) launched "NBA Arena" in the metaverse where you can watch matches in VR. Football is still cautious: the first full virtual stadium with a live match of the EPL was tested in 2025 during the "Arsenal" — "Tottenham" match. There were 10,000 testers. The result: 85% said that the experience was "almost like live." However, 60% complained about eye fatigue. FIFA plans to implement virtual stadiums at the 2030 World Cup, but only as an addition to real tickets. The 2026 World Cup in the US, Canada, and Mexico will see a "pilot" launch: several sections on stadiums will be available in VR for remote fans for an additional fee.
A virtual stadium is cheaper (ticket — $10-30 against $100-500), accessible to everyone, not dependent on the weather, not requiring time for transportation. You can watch several matches at the same time (switching). You can watch goals in slow motion. But you will not feel the smell of grass, not hear the live roar of the crowd, not feel the joy of hugging a stranger after a goal. Psychologists say that virtual joy is less profound than real. Moreover, the metaverse may increase loneliness: sitting alone in your room, you do not make new friends. The ideal is a hybrid: buy a ticket to a real stadium, but also load a VR app to see additional graphics.
If before a Liverpool fan from Australia could only dream of visiting "Anfield," now he will be able to "sit" on its virtual copy. This will strengthen the global brand of clubs. Small clubs will be able to compete with giants for audience attention if they create a better virtual experience. "Digital season tickets" will appear, which can be given to a friend in another country. Transfers of players can also become virtual: the cyber-version of Messi will move from one meta-club to another. This is already bordering on esports. But will clubs lose income from real tickets? Data is contradictory so far. Fans who can afford to go to the stadium will go, and those who cannot will be in the metaverse.
Who regulates behavior at a virtual stadium? The laws of the country where the server is located? Or an international agreement? If a fan from Iran shouts something that is forbidden in his country but allowed in the US, how to punish? Subtitles and translations are the responsibility of the club? Already now, there are disputes over copyright on "virtual celebrations": if thousands of avatars light fireworks, does it violate FIFA rules? In 2025, there was an incident when a virtual fan "simulated" a sexual act with an avatar of a referee. The host club disconnected him, but he returned with a new account. Digital passports tied to a real identity are needed.
The metaverse and virtual stadiums will not kill live football. But they will make it more accessible, technologically advanced, and possibly safer (without fights on the stands). In 2026, we are only at the beginning of this era. Soon the phrase "I was at that match" will no longer mean that you bought plane tickets. You just put on glasses. And this opens new opportunities — and new challenges. The main thing is not to forget the live emotions, for which we, in fact, love sports.
New publications: |
Popular with readers: |
News from other countries: |
![]() |
Editorial Contacts |
About · News · For Advertisers |
British Digital Library ® All rights reserved.
2023-2026, ELIBRARY.ORG.UK is a part of Libmonster, international library network (open map) Keeping the heritage of the Great Britain |
US-Great Britain
Sweden
Serbia
Russia
Belarus
Ukraine
Kazakhstan
Moldova
Tajikistan
Estonia
Russia-2
Belarus-2