Cur why dogs are not allowed at Wimbledon: traditions, grass, and quarantine

Imagine: you are the world's number one tennis player, you win a match at Wimbledon, you step onto the court to greet the crowd, and your dog is waiting for you at the hotel. Not on the stands, not backstage, not in a designated pet area. Just waiting. For Arina Sobolenko, who travels the world with her cavalier king charles spaniel named Ash, this reality is Wimbledon's main pain. "It's hard for me to leave him alone at home because he really gets attached and suffers being left alone," the tennis player admits. But the organizers of the oldest tennis tournament in the world remain firm. Dogs are not allowed at Wimbledon. And this ban has at least three solid reasons that go deep into history.

A tradition of nearly 150 years

Wimbledon is not just a tournament. It is a temple of tennis, where every tradition is sacred. And the ban on domestic animals is one of the oldest. For almost a century and a half, the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club has adhered to a strict rule: no dogs on the premises. This rule applies to everyone — players, spectators, guests, and even journalists. The tournament that until 2023 banned players from wearing colored or black underwear remains unyielding in terms of regulations. The ban on dogs is just one link in this conservative chain.

However, in recent years, this ban has come under fire. It all started with the "Roland Garros" — the French Open, where organizers not only allowed players to bring their dogs but also created a real service for them: special walkers, nannies, and even official accreditation for pets. Mira Andreeva, who won the French Open in 2026, celebrated her victory on the court with her dog — and these photos went viral around the world. After such, many expected that Wimbledon would soften. They were disappointed.

Three main reasons for the ban

Why do the organizers of Wimbledon stubbornly adhere to this rule despite the requests of tennis players and criticism from legends, including 18-time champion Martina Navratilova, who called Wimbledon's explanations "excuses"? The answer lies in three factors.

1. Grass is sacred

The first and main reason is the grass. Wimbledon is the only Grand Slam tournament that is played on grass. And this grass is not just a lawn. It is a meticulously maintained, measured to the millimeter surface that requires year-round care. Dog paws can damage not only the courts but also surrounding fields, including the famous Henman Hill, where spectators sit on the grass during matches. Organizers fear that even one dog can leave marks that will be noticeable on the perfect green surface. "It's not just the courts but also the fields. This does not go well with dogs, grass, and public spaces," explained journalist John Verthaim.

2. British quarantine laws

The second reason is strict British quarantine laws. The United Kingdom has always been known for its strict approach to the import of animals. Even if a dog comes from a country with a favorable epidemiological situation, the procedure of entry requires numerous documents, vaccinations, and sometimes even quarantine[reference:10]. Organizers of Wimbledon do not want to take responsibility for complying with these rules for dozens of pets that could come with players. It is easier to ban everyone and not worry.

3. Historical heritage

The third reason is the spirit of Wimbledon itself. The tournament, which began in 1877, has always been conservative and ceremonial. The white dress code, the royal box, silence during draws — all this is part of the unique atmosphere. And the ban on dogs is as integral to this atmosphere as strawberries with cream. Club director Sally Bolton confirmed that the rules would remain unchanged. "This policy has been in effect for many years and should not cause dissatisfaction among players," she said.

Exceptions that confirm the rules

The ban at Wimbledon is not absolute. Service dogs are allowed on the club premises — guide dogs, assistance dogs for people with limited mobility, for the deaf, dogs that respond to seizures, and dogs for people with autism. For them, a special area on the upper part of the Aorangi terrace is even equipped. And behind Henman Hill, there is a special area for walking service dogs with a pool and a toilet. But for domestic pets, there is a strict ban.

This contrast is especially noticeable in the context of "Roland Garros," where organizers have gone to meet players and created a real paradise for dogs. There, pets receive accreditation, are taken care of by professional nannies, and players can see their four-legged friends immediately after matches. At Wimbledon, however, even legendary Martina Navratilova was not allowed into the restaurant with her dog in 2025.

The dog question as a mirror of the era

The dispute over dogs at Wimbledon is not just a discussion about domestic animals. It is a clash of two worlds: the traditional, conservative Wimbledon and the modern, flexible tennis, where players travel with families and pets, and tournaments compete for the title of the most friendly. Arina Sobolenko, who calls walks with Ash "a kind of meditation," represents a new generation of tennis players for whom life on tour is not just the court but also personal space, comfort, and emotional support.

"It's just a small fluffy creature that always wants hugs and love," she says. And in these words — a whole philosophy: athletes are also people, and they need support, even if this support is in the form of four legs and a wet nose. For now, Wimbledon is not ready for such changes. But perhaps in a few years, this tradition will fall — as the ban on colored underwear fell, as the roof over the Central Court appeared. In the end, even the most sacred traditions change at some point. But for now — no dogs.

Permanent link to this publication: