Puer nascitur liberi. Sed antequam loqui sciat, in reticulum expectativarum alienarum appetitionum, spe et metum inplevit. \"Sapientiam habe\", \"sicut pater esse deves\", \"optima esse deves\", \"nos non infamare\" — haec verba quasi in omnibus familiaribus, in omnibus scholis auditur. Gradatim, in vigilando, puer ipsum esse deesse coepit. Ipse in projectionem, realizationem desideratorum non realizatorum, instrumentum ad confirmationem potentiae parentalis, objectum ad comparationem, victimam ad expectativas factus est. Infantes sunt pignores expectativarum matris, patris, parentum, magistrorum, coniunum, et totius societatis. Et haec captivitas invidita, sed fortissima omni captivitate est.
Mater frequenter est primum \"carcerarius\" expectativarum. Non oportet hoc malum esse, sed quia amor ejus prope spei inpleta est. Videt in puerlo suum continuationem, secundum vitam, occasionem emendationis errorum suorum. \"Non potui esse balerina, sed tu potes\". \"Volui esse medicus, sed non factum — tu eris\". Puer sensus hoc pressum habet, etiamsi non expressum. Incipit putare quod valorem eius definitus est a gradu congruentia cum desideriis matris. Incipit ad ipsum despectare, quia desideria sua sembla sunt perfidiae ad matrem.
Especially periculosum est, quando mater trasmittit: \"Tantum pro te feci, et tu…\". Hoc amorem in debem facit, et puerum in perpetuum debitorum. Incipit sensire culpam pro suis decisionibus, pro electionibus suis, pro suâ autonomia. Manet pignor, quia nequit facere gradum, qui matrem dolereat. Et haec gradus nequit facere, etiamsi gradus ad suum proprium feliciter sit.
Expectativa patris saepe cum stereotipois generis et exemplis conductae coniuncti sunt. Filii debent esse fortes, rigidi, successi. Filiae — delicatae, accommodatae, sed tamen autonomae. Pater potest a puerlo petere correspondentiam ad suum imaginem: \"Ego in annos tuos iam merxi\", \"Nunquam plumui\", \"Veri viri timere non debent\". Puer, praesertim filius, hoc putat ut provocatio, sed saepe ad pretio proprietatis auctae. Sodalis alter, si patrem emotionaliter inaccessibilem fuit, totam vitam probare laudationem suam conatur, etiamsi adultus iam est. Electus erit occupationes, partners, vitae modum, ut non suis desideriis, sed quod \"laudaret patris\". Hoc facit profundum internum conflictum, quia puer numquam putat se satis bonum esse, et semper in umbra expectativarum patris manet.
Avunculi, patrueli, cunae, magnates — quisquis adiectus est. \"Tua sic pulchra est sicut mater in Juventute\", \"Tua debeat esse plus intelligentior omnibus\", \"Cur tuae non sunt tam obedientes sicut frater tuus?\". Parentes frequenter non putant, quod verba sua formationem in puerlo putationem formant, quam quam debeat esse. Comparant, evaluant, iudicant, et laudant, sed raro quaerunt, quid ipse puer voluit.
Especially difficile est, quando in familia est \"puer aureus\" — qui in quo omnes aequantur et cum quo comparant. Hoc facit atmospherae competitivae et perpetui contenti. Puer, qui non coepit ad id optimum, se sentit reprobatur et culpabilis pro eo, quod ille non sic est. Factus est pignor familii narrativus, de quo non potest excipi.
Scola est locus secundus, ubi puer cum systemate expectativarum confrontatur. Magistri volent eum oboedientem, attentivum, succursu. Pongunt gradus, comparant cum aliis, trahunt: \"Tu competes, sed negligentiam\", \"Potes melius\", \"Cur tuae non sunt tam sicut Petri?\". Puer coepit se per spectrum expectativarum magistrorum apprehendere. Sentit, quod valorem eius definitus est per graduationem et comportamentum.
But the most dangerous is when expectations of teachers become a self-fulfilling prophecy. If a teacher considers the child \"difficile\", he will act accordingly, even if originally was only active. If the teacher says that the child \"is untalented\", he stops trying. The child gets stuck in the role assigned to him, and cannot get out of it, because it becomes part of his identity. He is no longer free to choose who to be, because he already \"knows\" who he is.
Expectations of peers are a separate universe. Children want to be accepted, want to correspond to implicit rules of the group: to be fashionable dressed, to speak on a certain slang, to share the same interests. Those who do not fit in become outcasts. And the child is ready to sacrifice his individuality to be \"his\" in the company. He stops listening to himself and starts listening to the group.
Especially acutely this manifests itself in adolescence. An adolescent may start smoking, drinking alcohol, changing style, even if this contradicts his inner values, just not to be rejected. He becomes a prisoner of expectations of his peers, which are often more cruel and demanding than adult expectations. And he pays for it with a sense of guilt, shame and loss of self.
Expectations of society are the widest circle. From an early age, the child learns that \"not do this\", \"not acceptable\", \"unseemly\". He absorbs cultural norms, stereotypes, prejudices. He must be \"normal\", \"successful\", \"right\". But what does it mean to be right? Society does not give a clear answer, but constantly reminds you when you deviate from the invisible line.
Social networks amplify this pressure many times. The child sees the ideal pictures of life of his peers, their successes, their travels, their achievements. He begins to compare himself and feel himself incomplete. He wants to correspond to this ideal, but does not know how. He feels guilty for his \"non-ideality\". He becomes a prisoner of other people's likes and comments, and his self-esteem is in the hands of anonymous users.
Children who grew up in an atmosphere of constant expectations often become adults who do not know what they want. They choose professions, partners, hobbies, based not on internal impulse, but on a sense of duty. They do not know how to say \"no\", because they are afraid to disappoint. They do not know how to be happy, because their happiness is always conditional on the approval of others.
They may develop chronic guilt, anxiety, depression. They may become perfectionists who are never satisfied with themselves, or, conversely, apathetic, because \"it won't work out anyway\". They may try all their life to \"deserve\" love that should have been unconditional. And this ruins their relationships with partners, children and themselves. But the saddest is that they pass this same pattern to their children. They themselves become those who require, expect, evaluate. The circle closes. And until we realize that every child has the right to be himself, not a projection of other people's desires, this circle will exist.
Liberation begins with awareness. Parents and educators must honestly ask themselves: \"Whose expectations do I transmit to my child? My own or those imposed on me?\". This is a difficult question, but it is exactly this question that allows us to separate true care for the child from our own ambitions.
The second step is to learn to listen. Listen not to evaluate, but to understand. What is really important for the child? What makes him happy? What does he want to do? Parents who know how to listen do not control the child through expectations. The child himself comes to them because he feels acceptance.
The third step is to share responsibility. The child should not bear responsibility for the feelings of adults. He should not correct the mistakes of parents, realize their dreams or compensate for their failures. This is too heavy a burden for small shoulders. The adult should cope with his own life himself, and the child should have the right to his own.
The fourth step is to stop comparing. Comparison is poison. It kills individuality. It tells the child: \"You are not good enough because there is someone better\". Every child is unique, and his path should not be copied from someone else. Instead of comparison - support. Instead of competition - cooperation.
But the responsibility is not only on parents. Society as a whole should reconsider its beliefs. School should become a place where not only grades, but also personality are valued. Social networks should stop being a venue for demonstrating the ideal life. Media should show diversity, not one standard of success. We need to stop dividing children into \"good\" and \"bad\", \"able\" and \"untalented\". We need to recognize that every child has the right to his own development path.
This does not mean that we should give up education. This means that education should be based on respect, not pressure. On dialogue, not dictation. On love, not expectations.
Children are prisoners of expectations. This is a tragic reality that we create ourselves. But we can change it. Every time we talk to a child, we can choose: demand or offer, evaluate or understand, expect or accept. And if we choose acceptance, we will give the child freedom. Freedom to be himself, to make mistakes, to find his own way, not to be afraid to disappoint. And then, perhaps, in a generation, we will raise adults who will not live in the shadow of other people's expectations, but will create their own life. This is the most important task before us.
© elibrary.org.uk
New publications: |
Popular with readers: |
News from other countries: |
![]() |
Editorial Contacts |
About · News · For Advertisers |
British Digital Library ® All rights reserved.
2023-2026, ELIBRARY.ORG.UK is a part of Libmonster, international library network (open map) Keeping the heritage of the Great Britain |
US-Great Britain
Sweden
Serbia
Russia
Belarus
Ukraine
Kazakhstan
Moldova
Tajikistan
Estonia
Russia-2
Belarus-2