ЖИЗНЬ И БОРЬБА СИМОНА БОЛИВАРА

МАДАГАСКАР: ПОЛИТИКА МАЛАГАСИЗАЦИИ

ЭМИГРАЦИЯ ИЗ ШВЕЙЦАРИИ В ПЕРВОЙ ПОЛОВИНЕ XIX века

Н. П. Комолова. СТО ЛЕТ ИСТОРИИ ИТАЛИИ (XX век)

ДВУХСОТЛЕТИЕ НАЧАЛА ВОЙНЫ ЗА НЕЗАВИСИМОСТЬ И СТОЛЕТИЕ РЕВОЛЮЦИИ 1910 года В МЕКСИКЕ

В. И. ХАРИТОНОВА. ФЕНИКС ИЗ ПЕПЛА? СИБИРСКИЙ ШАМАНИЗМ НА РУБЕЖЕ ТЫСЯЧЕЛЕТИЙ

Рассматриваются причины и возможные последствия кризиса современного экономического знания. Источник кризиса видится в потере экономическим знанием своей функции оценки смысла человеческой хозяйственной деятельности с тенденцией перерастания его в простую технологическую дисциплину оптимизационных расчетов. Предлагается модель теоретической экономии, которая включает в себя взаимодействующие сегменты философии хозяйства и физической экономии. / The causes and possible consequences of the crisis of modern economic knowledge are considered. The source of the crisis is seen in the loss of economic knowledge of its function of assessing the meaning of human economic activity with the tendency to outgrow it into a simple technological discipline of optimization calculations. A model of theoretical economy is proposed, which includes interacting segments of the philosophy of economy and physical economy.

ПОДВИГ В ХОДЕ ЭВАКУАЦИИ

The article gives my short life story with a list of my discoveries. May the terrible moralists forgive me, I call these hypotheses discoveries because their logical connectedness and conformity with the materialistic dialectic of thinking does not allow to doubt that truth has been found here.

Awareness of man himself, the birth of the human “I” occurred through a qualitative leap in the process of evolution of the population of brain giants, which appeared as a result of crossing Homo sapiens with Neanderthals.

istory make the masses. But the masses are ruled by leaders. The influence of an individual on the development of social processes is the greater, the greater the influence this personality has on the consciousness of individuals, as well as on the social consciousness of groups, classes and nations. The formula of Marx's social progress — the developing productive forces of society outgrow their production relations, throw them off and give birth to new ones — true, but only with Lenin's amendment: man is the main productive force of humanity.

Comparing all that is united by the concept of "mine" with all that is united by the concept of "not mine" the concept of "I" is born. Here begins the development of the individual consciousness of modern man, here began the development and individual consciousness of fossil people. It also began its development and public power, which initially could not have any other form, as soon as the form of protection of a mother who realized her motherhood to her children. Both individual consciousness and public power originate in the form of legal consciousness, and, first of all, in the form of awareness of the issues of belonging of certain objects to certain individuals, that is, in the form of awareness of the concepts "mine is not mine", "my child is not my child".

Dialectics is often called the tool of knowledge of nature. But, in the opinion of the author of this article, this tool is still as imperfect as the scissors would be imperfect, without the central screw uniting the two blades of this tool. This "cog" in dialectics is the fact that the "struggle" of opposites, which is the driving force behind the development of all processes of nature, is not absolute. "Struggle" is born when the dialectic system deviates from the state of equilibrium, and the goal of this "struggle" is to restore the lost equilibrium of the system.

Ivan Petrovich Pavlov, studying the physiological process, which he called the conditioned reflex, suggested that this process is the basis for the formation of mental reactions of all living organisms, including the thinking process of a human of a modern species. But, in our opinion, the human thinking process of the modern species is based not on one, but on four types of conditioned reflexes.